Arizona becomes first U.S. state to authorize non-lawyer ownership of law firms and fee sharing

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the Arizona Supreme Court’s recent implementation of rule revisions which will permit non-lawyers to own law firms and share fees with lawyers, and also makes other significant rule revisions.  The link to the Court’s August 27, 2020 press release explaining the rule revisions is here:

When the rule revisions become effective on January 1, 2021, Arizona will become the first U.S. state to implement revisions to its Bar rules permitting non-lawyer ownership of law firms and permitting non-lawyers to share fees with lawyers.

According to the press release, the rule revisions are intended to promote innovation and make legal services more affordable and still protecting the public.

“The court’s goal is to improve access to justice and to encourage innovation in the delivery of legal services. The work of the task force adopted by the court will make it possible for more people to access affordable legal services and for more individuals and families to get legal advice and help.”  “These new rules will promote business innovation in providing legal services at affordable prices.”

The press release states that, after the revised rules become effective, the court will adopt a new licensure process to allow non-lawyers, called “legal paraprofessionals,” to provide limited legal services to the public, including representing clients in court proceedings.  The revisions also eliminate rule 5.4, which prohibits non-lawyers from having an ownership interest in a law firm; however, these “alternative business structures” will be required to obtain licenses.

The Arizona Supreme Court also made revisions to the Bar rules regulating lawyer advertising “most of which align with recent changes made to the American Bar Association’s Model Rules.”

The press release states that more information about the revisions is on the Court’s Access to Legal Services webpage at

Bottom line:  The Arizona Supreme Court’s decision to revise the Bar rules continues the growing trend toward permitting non-lawyers and non-traditional entities to become involved in legal practice and the legal process.

As I previously blogged here:, the Utah Supreme Court also recently approved a two-year “regulatory sandbox” pilot program permitting non-lawyers to experiment with different methods of delivering legal services outside of the existing regulatory framework.  Washington, D.C. and other states are also considering potential revisions related to the restrictions on non-lawyer involvement in the practice of law.

Stay safe and healthy and be careful out there.

Disclaimer:  this e-mail is not an advertisement, does not contain any legal advice, and does not create an attorney/client relationship and the comments herein should not be relied upon by anyone who reads it.

Joseph A. Corsmeier, Esquire

Law Office of Joseph A. Corsmeier, P.A.

2999 Alt. 19, Suite A

Palm Harbor, Florida

Office (727) 799-1688

Fax     (727) 799-1670


Joseph Corsmeier


Filed under 2019 Utah pilot program permitting non-traditional legal services, including non-lawyer firm ownership, 2020 Arizona adoption of ABA advertising rules, 2020 Arizona authorization of non-lawyer practice, fee sharing and limited practice, 2020 Utah Supreme Court Order approving sandbox and non- lawyer practice and ownership, ABA Model Rules, ABA revised advertising rules, Arizona Supreme Court authorization of non-lawyer ownership of law firms, sharing fees, and practice of law, Attorney Ethics, fee sharing, Fee sharing with non-lawyer owned firms, joe corsmeier, Joseph Corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer advertising and solicitation APRL report, Lawyer advertising rules, Lawyer ethics, lawyer fee splitting, Lawyer referral fees, Lawyer sharing fees with non-lawyers, Non lawyer compensation, Non-lawyer limited practice, Non-lawyer limited practice of law, Non-lawyer ownership, Non-lawyer ownership of law firms, non-lawyer ownership of law firms and fee splitting, Non-lawyer practice, Non-lawyer practice of law, Non-lawyer practicing law, Uncategorized

5 responses to “Arizona becomes first U.S. state to authorize non-lawyer ownership of law firms and fee sharing

  1. Isn’t this just lovely? When will Florida follow?


    Mark A. Addington, Esq.
    Attorney at Law

    Phone: 904-248-2429

    9471 Baymeadows Road, Suite 406
    Jacksonville, Florida 32256
    Electronic Privacy Notice: This email, and any attachments, contains information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or email, and then immediately destroy the original communication. Thank you for your cooperation.

  2. Pingback: Elementor #905 – Corporate and Business Law Journal

  3. Pingback: Utah Supreme Court approves Rocket Lawyer and other entities to participate in regulatory “sandbox” | Lawyer Ethics Alert Blogs

  4. Pingback: Utah Supreme Court approves Rocket Lawyer and other entities to participate in regulatory “sandbox” | joe corsmeier

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s